Military Industrial Company - In response to a call from Finnish military industry company Patria, more than 50 Latvian companies have expressed interest in participating in a future industrial cluster for the army, Latvian radio reported on July 26.
Intends to develop and produce 6x6 armored vehicles for Finland, Latvia and Estonia. The willingness of Latvian entrepreneurs to participate shows that the money from the defense budget will stay in Latvia and those involved will be able to overcome the difficulties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Military Industrial Company
Earlier this year, the Latvian and Finnish defense ministers signed an agreement to launch a joint research and development program for a new armored vehicle system. Estonia also joined the project in April. A consortium of companies is being formed, which will supply the raw materials for future armored vehicles, as well as their day-to-day maintenance.
Vpk Llc Displays Tigr And Bear Special Armoured Vehicles At Idex 2017
The will was noticeable for the age of Latvian companies, representing such fields as metallurgy, manufacture of electronic components and rubber products, small arms, mechanical industry and others. Latvian companies will manufacture the parts, send them to Finland and the vehicles will be built in Finland.
Defense Minister Artis Pabriks (Development/For) said the project also helps achieve the goal of money staying in the country, boosting Latvian exports, businesses and jobs.
"Obviously this gives us additional opportunities to deliver. Starting with repairs. Then if we go into a crisis situation, God forbid, a war, supply lines will be interrupted. And the COVID crisis -19 shows that this often happens. Wear masks when At the same time as it was necessary to buy masks, EU member states set the precondition that their interests come first,” Pabrix said.
The minister stressed that the door was open to all organizations that could collaborate
Sami Inks Saudi Arabia's Largest Ever Military Industries Deal
“The public must understand: the money that goes to the Armed Forces of Latvia is not shot in the air. It is invested here and creates additional benefit not only for the armed forces, but for society as a whole,” Pabrix said. Used to describe toxic alliances between special interests and those in power. Companies can make a lot of money selling weapons to governments, and these companies can fund candidates that are favorable to their business model. Our new visualization shows how the United States ignored Eisenhower's warnings.
We created our chart from a list of companies compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). SIPRI calculated each company's revenue from making and selling weapons - think military planes, tanks, drones, missiles, guns, etc. Next, we created a bar chart showing annual revenue from military sales. You can easily see how big a deal crafting and selling weapons is.
Our chart quickly reveals two key aspects of the military-industrial complex. First, the manufacturing of aircraft and military equipment is a multi-billion dollar industry dominated by a handful of players. Lockheed Martin became the biggest contributor, surpassing $40.8 billion in annual sales. This represents only 86% of the company's total annual turnover. Boeing stands out as another household name that most people wouldn't expect to find at the top of the list - they make $29.5 billion in annual arms sales. Unlike Lockheed, this sector represents only 31% of the company's total annual turnover. Airbus ($12.5 billion) deserves a special mention as the highest ranked company from a non-English speaking country (France).
Another interesting trend in our visualization is how American companies are dominating the industry. 13 of these 20 largest companies are headquartered in the United States, collectively generating $178.5 billion in annual military equipment sales. Two other companies are from the UK, which means that 80% of the top 20 companies are from the English-speaking world. Another important point to remember is that every company on the list comes from the developed western world. Ultimately, this means that all active war zones in the world are almost certainly made possible by Western agencies.
Adapting The Henry Ford Model: How Military Vehicle Manufacturers Customize Production
What is the big lesson of our visualization? The countries included in our visuals have foreign policies committed to international institutions, the rule of law and peacemaking efforts (except perhaps Russia). Large parts of the economies of developed countries (especially the United States) depend on the manufacture and sale of arms and other military-related products. Does this mean that the stated goals of US foreign policy to promote global efforts for peace are inherently at odds with the nation's national political and economic interests? Private companies making and selling guns are not the same as governments encouraging their use in other countries' war zones, but President Eisenhower's previous warning is great food for thought.
These will soon be sold. We'll email you when we're ready, just leave your address in the box
If you want to use our visualizations in books, magazines, reports, teaching materials, etc. We may issue a license document, which grants non-exclusive rights of reproduction, storage, publication and distribution. The military-industrial complex is the military establishment of a country, as well as the industries involved in the production of weapons and other military equipment. In his 1961 farewell address, US President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned the public about the nation's increasingly powerful military-industrial complex and threats to American democracy. Today, the United States routinely spends more on military and defense spending than any other country.
A retired US Army five-star general, Dwight D. Eisenhower served as an Allied commander in World War II and led the 1944 D-Day invasion of France.
Snow And Swamp Going Vehicle Gaz 34039 `irbis` Editorial Stock Image
Eisenhower's two terms as President of the United States (1953-61) coincided with an era of military expansion greater than any other in the country. Instead of reducing its troops as after WWII, the U.S. military maintained a large standing army after the end of the Korean War in 1953 and maintained a high level of military readiness due to the ongoing Cold War. between the United States and the United States. The soviet union.
Private companies that had returned to civilian production after past wars continued to manufacture weapons, creating increasingly sophisticated weapons in an arms race with the Soviets.
Despite—or perhaps because of—his own wartime experience, Eisenhower remained preoccupied throughout his presidency with the nation's military buildup and the escalation of the Cold War. He attempted to cut the military services budget during his presidency, angering many in the Pentagon.
As Eisenhower biographer David Nichols told The Associated Press in 2010: “The military wanted a lot more than they were willing to give. This discouraged the army. He thought about it all the time. »
Armored Vehicle With Enhanced Mine Protection Mic 3924 \
Eisenhower did not invent the term "military-industrial complex", but he made it famous. On January 17, 1961, John F. Three days before Kennedy was inaugurated as his successor, Eisenhower gave a farewell speech on a television broadcast from the Oval Office.
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unintended influence by the military-industrial complex, whether sought or not,” warned the 34th president. "The potential for catastrophic surges of misplaced energy exists and will continue to exist."
According to Eisenhower, "the combination of a large military establishment and a large arms industry is novel in the American experience", and he feared that it would lead to policies that would not benefit Americans as a whole. - as an increase in the nuclear arms race, to the great detriment of the well-being of the nation.
In addition to the Department of Defense and private military contractors, Eisenhower and his advisers included members of Congress from military-industrially dependent districts in the military-industrial complex.
Chinese Company Hikvision Confirms It's Controlled By China's Military Industrial Complex
Although dangerous, Eisenhower considered the military-industrial complex necessary to deter the Soviet Union from aggression against the United States and its allies. But he urged the government's successors to balance defense and diplomacy in their dealings with the Soviet Union, saying: "We must learn to tell the difference not with arms, but with intelligence and decent intentions."
Some have claimed that Eisenhower intended to call out the “military-industrial-congressional complex” to explicitly call for a role for Congress in the growth of the military industry, but he hit the final deadline at the last minute to avoid objections. Legislators
, the evidence deviates from this theory: A draft of the speech dated about a month before it was delivered included the phrase “military-industrial complex” intact.
Yet it was clear that Eisenhower and his advisers saw at least some members of Congress as playing a role in the danger the military-industrial complex posed to the public.
Increased Us Artillery Power: New M109a7 Paladin Howitzers Ordered
Eisenhower and his fellow conservatives also saw the growth of the military-industrial complex as part of a greater expansion of federal power that began with President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal.
Since Eisenhower delivered it in 1961, his farewell speech has become a touchstone for those concerned about unplanned military expansion and the continued close relationship between private military contractors, military and the federal government.
USA is regular
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-485925973-bd5318121c2e472f9eb8538c8a143804.jpg "Military Infertility")
